Subject: Re: [xsl] XML output ugly From: "Adam Retter adam.retter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Jan 2018 20:21:15 -0000 |
I guess it depends how FMP controls the serialization of Xalan, or if it adds additional Serialization of its own to the output from Xalan. On 11 January 2018 at 19:53, Michele R Combs mrrothen@xxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi Adam -- > > > > I've got that set in my xsl, but it doesn't seem to matter to FileMaker :P > > > > Apparently FMP uses Xalan as its processor, would that matter? > > > > Michele > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Adam Retter adam.retter@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] > > Sent: Thursday, January 11, 2018 2:20 PM > > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > Subject: Re: [xsl] XML output ugly > > > > The serializer usually has a flag for indentation. > > > > If you are using XSLT you can use <xsl:output indent="yes"/> > > > > -- Adam Retter skype: adam.retter tweet: adamretter http://www.adamretter.org.uk
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XML output ugly, Rick Quatro rick@xxx | Thread | [xsl] Schema question, Leo Studer leo.stude |
Re: [xsl] XML output ugly, Bridger Dyson-Smith | Date | Re: [xsl] XML output ugly, Michele R Combs mrro |
Month |