Subject: Re: [xsl] XSLT repetition constructs From: "Dave Pawson dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2019 08:44:12 -0000 |
On Fri, 8 Mar 2019 at 08:40, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Because if $a is an empty sequence (which is the situation on the first call), then $a[last()] is an empty sequence, and ($x + ()) returns an empty sequence, not $x. I'm sure I'm not the only one thinking that sounds illogical Mike? (DC?) I'd appreciated the 'logic' behind that decision (maths?) regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ.
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] XSLT repetition construct, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Thread | Re: [xsl] XSLT repetition construct, Michael Kay mike@xxx |
Re: [xsl] XSLT repetition construct, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT repetition construct, Michael Kay mike@xxx |
Month |