Subject: Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json() function useful From: "Mukul Gandhi gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 14 Mar 2019 03:58:34 -0000 |
Hi Wendell, On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 1:58 AM Wendell Piez wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx < xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I think good tools (like oXygen in this case) do make it > possible to be much more ambitious with XSLT, if only because they > make it possible to visualize, represent and manage more complex > processes, such (in this case for example) as 2-stage or multi-stage > pipelines producing specialized serialization formats including JSON. > I agree. Very well articulated. > Aren't we saying > that good tools make difficult things easier, if you know how to use > them? Definitely. > I do wonder who you have in mind when you talk about the > "average developer" as mostly, she or he would not be writing XSLT, > would they? > The phrase "average developer", I wrote was a bit casual. I probably meant average XSLT developer. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json(, Wendell Piez wapiez@ | Thread | Re: [xsl] is XPath 3.1 xml-to-json(, Christophe Marchand |
[xsl] [ANN] Call for Participation:, Tommie Usdin btusdin | Date | Re: [xsl] XSLT code for function fn, Mukul Gandhi gandhi. |
Month |