Subject: Re: [xsl] W3C Specification of fn:filter() -- is this a bug in the document or in Saxon? From: "Liam R. E. Quin liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 02:46:59 -0000 |
On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 00:32 +0000, Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Sadly, I am unable to research an answer to historical questions, > because I no longer have member access to W3C's archives. Nor i... > The likely reason, though, will be a negative: the spec is the way it > is because no-one (either within or outwith the WG) saw a problem > with it. +1 - there's two parts to it: writing the example and, as you point out, reviewing it. For those who weren't there - towards the end of the work, five people at a face to face meeting was considered good attendance. > Frankly, if this is the biggest problem that people can find, then we > did a remarkably good job. :-) :-) -- Liam Quin, https://www.delightfulcomputing.com/ Available for XML/Document/Information Architecture/XSLT/ XSL/XQuery/Web/Text Processing/A11Y training, work & consulting. Barefoot Web-slave, antique illusrtations: http://www.fromoldbooks.org/ id="-x-evo-selection-start-marker">
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] W3C Test Suites, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Thread | Re: [xsl] W3C Specification of fn:f, Dimitre Novatchev dn |
Re: [xsl] W3C Specification of fn:f, Dimitre Novatchev dn | Date | Re: [xsl] W3C Test Suites, Michael Kay mike@xxx |
Month |