Subject: Re: [xsl] return of the XSL FAQ From: "Liam R. E. Quin liam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 18 May 2020 17:08:20 -0000 |
On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 16:01 +0000, Wendell Piez wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Hi, > > I concur entirely with Dimitre on this. Thank you both, that's very helpful. > I think we need both the old > FAQ, and a new FAQ covering the best current practice in XSLT 2020+, > including XSLT 3.0 solutions. Well, you know what Tommie said about Best Practice :-) :-) but yes, there should certainly be a live current-version FAQ, and for me the question is whether to combine them, or whether to treat Dave's as essentially frozen except for any fixes needed. I'll wait a few more days to give others a chance to comment (especially Dave himself!). But i'm leaning towards keeping the existing 1.0/2.0 FAQ unchanged (except e.g. if there are broken links etc) and starting a new one that incorporates XSLT 3 and current work and implementations. The new one, as per Dmitre and Wendell, could use parts of the old one, given any necessary permission, to build on the work done before that was so useful. Peter, thanks for updating the XML FAQ. Liam -- Liam Quin, https://www.delightfulcomputing.com/ Available for XML/Document/Information Architecture/XSLT/ XSL/XQuery/Web/Text Processing/A11Y training, work & consulting. Barefoot Web-slave, antique illustrations: http://www.fromoldbooks.org
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] return of the XSL FAQ, Wendell Piez wapiez@ | Thread | Re: [xsl] return of the XSL FAQ, Debbie Lapeyre dalap |
Re: [xsl] XSLT 4: xsl:template/@sel, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Date | Re: [xsl] return of the XSL FAQ, Debbie Lapeyre dalap |
Month |