Subject: Re: [xsl] Tool that measures the performance of an XSLT program at a fine granularity? From: "Mukul Gandhi gandhi.mukul@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 10:24:35 -0000 |
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 3:48 PM Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx < xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > No, current-dateTime() is explicitly defined to give constant results > throughout an evaluation. That's because there isn't any defined order of > execution, so "later" has no meaning. > > There is a function saxon:timestamp() designed to get around this. But at > this level of granularity the results are going to be meaninless. > Thanks for the clarification. -- Regards, Mukul Gandhi
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Tool that measures the pe, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Thread | Re: [xsl] Tool that measures the pe, Dr. Roger L Costello |
Re: [xsl] Tool that measures the pe, Michael Kay mike@xxx | Date | Re: [xsl] case conversion with repl, Wolfhart Totschnig w |
Month |