Subject: Re: [xsl] Analyze-string Regex to Match Content within Curly Braces From: "Graydon graydon@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 17 Nov 2020 15:07:25 -0000 |
On Tue, Nov 17, 2020 at 02:59:17PM -0000, Wendell Piez wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx scripsit: > Hi, > > <xsl:analyze-string regex="\{.+?\}" interpret-attributes-as-avt="no"> .. > > samish as? > > <xsl:analyze-string regex-string="\{.+?\}"> ... > > whereas the current @regex is a @regex-avt ... I like that! Does it mean we'd need a generalized @select-string, @select-avt distinction? Can't imagine anyone would go for breaking the back-compatibility of @select, so @select would have to be a synonym of @select-avt. <xsl:map-entry key="'some-value'" select="'RELATED-VALUE'"/> doesn't happen all that much but it sure feels like it when I have to type it. <xsl:map-entry key-string="some-value" select-string="RELATED-VALUE"/> vs <xsl:map-entry key-is-not-avt="true()" key="some-value" select-is-not-avt="true()" select="RELATED-VALUE" /> seems like an obvious choice. -- Graydon Saunders | graydonish@xxxxxxxxx ^fs oferiode, pisses swa mfg. -- Deor ("That passed, so may this.")
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Analyze-string Regex to M, Wendell Piez wapiez@ | Thread | Re: [xsl] Analyze-string Regex to M, Dave Pawson dave.paw |
Re: [xsl] Analyze-string Regex to M, Wendell Piez wapiez@ | Date | Re: [xsl] Analyze-string Regex to M, Dave Pawson dave.paw |
Month |