Re: [xsl] with XPath 1.0, select all following sibling elements of name "foo" up to the first non-"foo" element

Subject: Re: [xsl] with XPath 1.0, select all following sibling elements of name "foo" up to the first non-"foo" element
From: "G. Ken Holman g.ken.holman@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 18 Feb 2021 19:37:12 -0000
self::a:b is namespace-sensitive.
name(.)='a:b' is not namespace-sensitive.

Namespace sensitivity always is preferred.

I hope this helps.

. . . . . . . Ken

At 2021-02-18 18:43 +0000, Wolfhart Totschnig
wolfhart.totschnig@xxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hello again,

Thank you, Wendell!

The proposed solutions leave me with two questions:


1) Is there a way to do what I originally had in mind, i.e., go forward to the first non-"foo" sibling and from there go backwards, taking all the "foo" siblings up to the current node? Asked differently, can the following XPath expression be fixed?

following-sibling::*[not(self::source)][1]/preceding-sibling::*[self::source
][preceding-sibling::current()]

Specifically, can "preceding-sibling::current()" be fixed?



2) Liam's and Wendell's proposals involve the expression [name()=...], whereas I have used [self:: ...]. Are these strictly equivalent, or is there a reason to prefer the one over the other?


Thanks again for your help! Wolfhart


On 18-02-21 13:06, Wendell Piez <mailto:wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wapiez@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
Hi,

With a sequence of variable declarations:

<xsl:variable name="name" select="name()"/>
<xsl:variable name="followers"
select="following-sibling::*[name()=$name]"/>
<xsl:variable name="interlopers"
select="following-sibling::*[not(name()=$name)]
| following-sibling::*[not(name()=$name)]/following-sibling::*"/>
<xsl:variable name="invited" select=". |
$followers[not(count(.|$interlopers)=count($interlopers))]"/>

Note: untested.

Good luck,
Wendell
B  B B

On Wed, Feb 17, 2021 at 8:32 PM Wolfhart
Totschnig
<mailto:wolfhart.totschnig@xxxxxxxxxxx>wolfhart.totschnig@xxxxxxxxxxx
<<mailto:xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxx
berrytech.com>
wrote:
Dear list,

I am facing an XPath problem for which I cannot find the solution. I
want to select all following sibling elements of name "foo" up to the
first non-"foo" element. So, in the following case, the first two <foo>
elements should be selected:

<foo/>
<foo/>
<bar/>
<foo/>

In the following case, all three <foo> elements should be selected:

<foo/>
<foo/>
<foo/>

And in the following case, nothing should be selected:

<bar/>
<foo/>
<foo/>

I came up with the following non-working approach:

B B B B  B B B  B B B  <xsl:choose>
B B B B  B B B  B B B  B B B  <xsl:when
test="not(following-sibling::*[not(self::foo)])">
B B B B  B B B  B B B  B B B  B B
B  <xsl:value-of select="following-sibling::*"/>
B B B B  B B B  B B B  B B B  </xsl:when>
B B B B  B B B  B B B  B B B  <xsl:otherwise>
B B B B  B B B  B B B  B B B  B B B  <xsl:value-of
select="following-sibling::*[not(self::source)][1]/preceding-sibling::*[sel
f::source][preceding-sibling::current()]"/>
B B B B  B B B  B B B  B B B  </xsl:otherwise>
B B B B  B B B  B B B  </xsl:choose>

That is, test whether there are non-"foo" following siblings. If there
are none, take all following siblings. If there are, go forward to the
first non-"foo" sibling, and from there go backwards, taking all the
"foo" siblings up to the current node.

But this does not work. Apparently, the expression
"preceding-sibling::current()" is not a valid construct. So what is the
correct way to do what I have in mind (or a simpler solution, if there
is one). Please note that this stylesheet needs to be executed by a web
browser, and so the solution has to remain within XPath 1.0.

Thanks in advance for your help!
Wolfhart


--
Contact info, blog, articles, etc. http://www.CraneSoftwrights.com/s/ |
Check our site for free XML, XSLT, XSL-FO and UBL developer resources |
Streaming hands-on XSLT/XPath 2 training class @US$125 (5 hours free) |
Essays (UBL, XML, etc.) http://www.linkedin.com/today/author/gkholman |

Current Thread