Subject: Re: [xsl] Sibling recursion? From: "Michael Kay mike@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 16:54:52 -0000 |
> On 3 Mar 2022, at 16:31, David Carlisle d.p.carlisle@xxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > would I be thrown off xsl-list for suggesting sed? > > $ sed -e 's@</q>\(\s*\)<q>@ @g' q.xml Fine for a one-off ad-hoc task, but please not in a production workflow that someone is going to have to debug in three years' time when the input data starts to arrive with sections commented out. Michael Kay Saxonica
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Sibling recursion?, David Carlisle d.p.c | Thread | [xsl] use contains() function on a , Wolfhart Totschnig w |
Re: [xsl] Sibling recursion?, David Carlisle d.p.c | Date | Re: [xsl] Sibling recursion?, David Birnbaum djbpi |
Month |