Subject: Re: [xsl] Rexsel — A simpler way of writing XSLT From: "Hugh Field-Richards hsfr@xxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 18:48:48 -0000 |
> On 30 Jun 2024, at 17:26, Peter Flynn peter@xxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Clearly I should have done some more homework on this, sighb& >> The thing that prompted me to design Rexsel was all the >> years spent on using OmniMark, then crossing over to XSLT, >> and then needing to bpretty-printb some XSLT to make it a >> bit more readable. > > I'm speaking in ignorance of other editors here, as I've been using Emacs with xslide-mode for two decades, and it both colourises and indents XSLT pretty well, as well as the usual auto-complete. I had always assumed other editors did much the same. Most editors will be syntax aware and colourise/indent XSLT. But what they donbt do is perform any analysis of variables and named templates used and referenced as well as duplicates. For example, duplicates and undeclared variables. As far as I know the only one is the oXygen editor. There are almost certainly others and would be more than happy to be proved wrong. Hugh
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Rexsel — A simpler way o, Martin Honnen martin | Thread | Re: [xsl] Rexsel — A simpler way o, Liam R. E. Quin liam |
Re: [xsl] Rexsel — A simpler way o, Chris Papademetrious | Date | Re: [xsl] Rexsel — A simpler way o, Hugh Field-Richards |
Month |