<-prev [Thread] next-> <-prev [Date] next->
Month Index | List Home

Re: [xsl] Rexsel — A simpler way of writing XSLT

Subject: Re: [xsl] Rexsel — A simpler way of writing XSLT
From: "Hugh Field-Richards hsfr@xxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 30 Jun 2024 18:57:16 -0000
Slip of the memory I fear b wonbt see the right side of 75 years again
:-)

I started with OmniMark (and SGML, but that is another story) before XSLT
arrived and used that for some years finally going over to XSLT. Main reason
being the cost of the former after they withdrew a free version. Irritating
because OmniMark could process free text, not just tagged text such as XML.

Hugh


> On 30 Jun 2024, at 12:23, Dave Pawson dave.pawson@xxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi
>>
>> I have been working with XSLT/XML for sometime
>> now (>25 years)
>
> XSL Transformations (XSLT)
> Version 1.0
>
> W3C Recommendation 16 November 1999
>
> Difficult.
>
> regards
>
>
>
> --
> Dave Pawson
> XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
> Docbook FAQ.
Current Thread
<- PreviousIndexNext ->
Re: [xsl] Rexsel — A simpler way o, Dave Pawson dave.paw Thread Re: [xsl] Rexsel — A simpler way o, Michael Kay mike@xxx
Re: [xsl] Rexsel — A simpler way o, Hugh Field-Richards Date Re: [xsl] Rexsel — A simpler way o, Michael Kay mike@xxx
Month