Subject: Re: [xsl] Scope of => From: "Alan Painter alan.painter@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 12:48:38 -0000 |
The table that Martin pointed out from the specification indicates that it is in order of "lowest to highest", hence '=>' (line 16) has higher precedence than '=' (line 5). On Thu, Aug 22, 2024, 14:43 Leo Studer leo.studer@xxxxxxxxxxx < xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Does https://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-31/#id-precedence-order help? > > > Not really, I would expect > > A = B => not() and (A=B) => not() > > To be the same since = precedes => > > > > XSL-List info and archive <http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list> > EasyUnsubscribe <http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/552232> (by > email <>)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Leo Studer leo.stude | Thread | Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Leo Studer leo.stude |
Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Leo Studer leo.stude | Date | Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Michael Kay michaelk |
Month |