|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Scope of => From: "Leo Studer leo.studer@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:48:52 -0000 |
Get it, makes sense, thanks
Sent from my dish washer
On 22 Aug 2024, at 14:49, Alan Painter alan.painter@xxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
o;?The table that Martin pointed out from the specification indicates
that it is in order of "lowest to highest", hence '=>' (line 16) has
higher precedence than '=' (line 5).
On Thu, Aug 22, 2024, 14:43 Leo Studer leo.studer@xxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Does https://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-31/#id-precedence-order
help?
Not really, I would expect
A = B => not() and (A=B) => not()
To be the same since = precedes =>
XSL-List info and archiveEasyUnsubscribe (by email)
XSL-List info and archiveEasyUnsubscribe (by email)
XSL-List info and archiveEasyUnsubscribe (by email)
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Alan Painter alan.pa | Thread | Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Michael Kay michaelk |
| Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Michael Kay michaelk | Date | Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Leo Studer leo.stude |
| Month |