Subject: Re: [xsl] Scope of => From: "Leo Studer leo.studer@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:48:52 -0000 |
Get it, makes sense, thanks Sent from my dish washer On 22 Aug 2024, at 14:49, Alan Painter alan.painter@xxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: o;?The table that Martin pointed out from the specification indicates that it is in order of "lowest to highest", hence '=>' (line 16) has higher precedence than '=' (line 5). On Thu, Aug 22, 2024, 14:43 Leo Studer leo.studer@xxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: Does https://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-31/#id-precedence-order help? Not really, I would expect A = B => not() and (A=B) => not() To be the same since = precedes => XSL-List info and archiveEasyUnsubscribe (by email) XSL-List info and archiveEasyUnsubscribe (by email) XSL-List info and archiveEasyUnsubscribe (by email)
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Alan Painter alan.pa | Thread | Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Michael Kay michaelk |
Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Michael Kay michaelk | Date | Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Leo Studer leo.stude |
Month |