| Subject: Re: [xsl] Scope of => From: "Leo Studer leo.studer@xxxxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2024 14:48:52 -0000 | 
Get it, makes sense, thanks 
Sent from my dish washer 
  On 22 Aug 2024, at 14:49, Alan Painter alan.painter@xxxxxxxxx
  <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
  o;?The table that Martin pointed out from the specification indicates
  that it is in order of "lowest to highest", hence '=>' (line 16) has
  higher precedence than '=' (line 5).
  On Thu, Aug 22, 2024, 14:43 Leo Studer leo.studer@xxxxxxxxxxx <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  wrote:
      Does https://www.w3.org/TR/xpath-31/#id-precedence-order
      help?
    Not really, I would expect 
    A = B => not()   and  (A=B) => not()
    To be the same since = precedes =>
    XSL-List info and archiveEasyUnsubscribe (by email)
  XSL-List info and archiveEasyUnsubscribe (by email)
XSL-List info and archiveEasyUnsubscribe (by email)
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Alan Painter alan.pa | Thread | Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Michael Kay michaelk | 
| Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Michael Kay michaelk | Date | Re: [xsl] Scope of =>, Leo Studer leo.stude | 
| Month |