| Subject: Re: [xsl] v4 mode From: "Graydon graydon@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 11:02:19 -0000 | 
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 10:32:21AM -0000, Andre Cusson akhu01@xxxxxxxxx scripsit:
> Yet, could/should functions feasibly be mode-scoped (or even mode-scoped &
> mode-sensitive ;)?
Under what circumstances would we want a built-in funtion (necessarily
statically provided with a mode, presumably one of #all, #default, or
#unnamed) not work sometimes?
-- Graydon
--  
Graydon Saunders  | graydonish@xxxxxxxxxxxx
\xDE\xE6s ofer\xE9ode, \xF0isses sw\xE1 m\xE6g.
-- Deor  ("That passed, so may this.")
| Current Thread | 
|---|
| 
 | 
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> | 
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] v4 mode, Michael Kay michaelk | Thread | Re: [xsl] v4 mode, Michael Kay michaelk | 
| Re: [xsl] v4 mode, Michael Kay michaelk | Date | Re: [xsl] v4 mode, Michael Kay michaelk | 
| Month |