Re: [xsl] v4 mode

Subject: Re: [xsl] v4 mode
From: "Graydon graydon@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 11:02:19 -0000
On Fri, Jan 24, 2025 at 10:32:21AM -0000, Andre Cusson akhu01@xxxxxxxxx scripsit:
> Yet, could/should functions feasibly be mode-scoped (or even mode-scoped &
> mode-sensitive ;)?

Under what circumstances would we want a built-in funtion (necessarily
statically provided with a mode, presumably one of #all, #default, or
#unnamed) not work sometimes?

-- Graydon

--  
Graydon Saunders  | graydonish@xxxxxxxxxxxx
\xDE\xE6s ofer\xE9ode, \xF0isses sw\xE1 m\xE6g.
-- Deor  ("That passed, so may this.")

Current Thread