Re: [xsl] v4 mode

Subject: Re: [xsl] v4 mode
From: "Michael Kay michaelkay90@xxxxxxxxx" <xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2025 11:47:10 -0000
> On 24 Jan 2025, at 11:02, Graydon graydon@xxxxxxxxx
<xsl-list-service@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
> Under what circumstances would we want a built-in funtion (necessarily
> statically provided with a mode, presumably one of #all, #default, or
> #unnamed) not work sometimes?
>

Sorry, I don't think I understand the question. This about user-defined
functions scoped to a user-defined named mode.

Michael Kay
Saxonica

Current Thread