Subject: Re: Garfield: "Acknowledged Self-Archiving is Not Prior Publication" From: Stevan Harnad <harnad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2002 18:02:20 +0100 (BST) |
On Mon, 9 Sep 2002, [identity removed] wrote: >sh> Currently, copyright law is doing double duty, (1) protecting >sh> copyright-holders from users who would make copies of their >sh> texts without paying for them (give-away authors do not want this >sh> protection) and (2) protecting copyright-holders from users who >sh> would make corrupted copies of their texts (including copies in >sh> which someone else is listed as the author). Almost all authors >sh> still want protection from the latter. > [identity removed]: This is, I think, a material point that has > otherwise been overlooked in the debate. Agreed. But "overlooked" is an operational matter! It's not as if this point has not been made, in writing (and skywriting), repeatedly, to be looked over (by those with eyes open to see and minds open to understand!) See: "PostGutenberg Copyright Concerns" http://www.ecs.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Tp/resolution.htm#5 [or just do a google search on: (harnad copyright protection authorship)] Stevan Harnad NOTE: A complete archive of the ongoing discussion of providing open access to the peer-reviewed research literature online is available at the American Scientist September Forum (98 & 99 & 00 & 01 & 02): http://amsci-forum.amsci.org/archives/september98-forum.html or http://www.cogsci.soton.ac.uk/~harnad/Hypermail/Amsci/index.html Discussion can be posted to: september98-forum@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx See also the Budapest Open Access Initiative: http://www.soros.org/openaccess and the Free Online Scholarship Movement: http://www.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/timeline.htm
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Garfield: "Acknowledged Self-Ar, Stevan Harnad | Thread | Re: Garfield: "Acknowledged Self-Ar, Joseph J. Esposito |
In The News, Olga Francois | Date | Re: Garfield: "Acknowledged Self-Ar, Joseph J. Esposito |
Month |