Subject: Re: Permission to use screenshots of databases From: "Jack Boeve" <JBoeve@xxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 10:25:22 -0400 |
[ON BEHALF OF GEORGIA HARPER...] This is an excellent example of the subjectivity involved in the fair use analysis. I ran the same test linked to below, based on the facts as I had them (and I assume Kerry has the exact same facts, no more no less), and I came out with 4 to 1 in favor of fair use. Interesting, no? So think about how this subjectivity works in court. If this were a real case, and you were the judge, you'd observe the arguments for each side (you'd see how from one perspective, the use looks like a horrendous use -- from the other, it's the most benign thing imaginable) and you'd choose what you felt was the right outcome and then you would explain your decision in an analysis that reflects your conclusion about what is the right outcome. Probably not a carbon copy of the winning side's analysis, but enough of their analysis to make the balance go the way you are convinced it should. This is what makes risk tolerance in fair use analysis so important. You *must* be aware of your level of tolerance and understand how it affects your conclusions. If you are not tolerant of any risk, you are going to tend to analyze conservatively and then reject any use that isn't a slam-dunk. If you are tolerant of risk, you're going to tend to analyze more liberally and accept as fair those uses that others will reasonably argue are not fair (ie, on the line and can go either way). The thing is that there are an awful lot of uses that are in the category of ambiguity because of the subjectivity involved. It's not hard to understand why there's so much disagreement about whether particular uses (electronic reserves, for example) are fair or not even among people on the same side of the issue (ie, academics, librarians and the lawyers who represent them). The other important factor is practice. The more fair use cases you have read, the more you've tried doing fair use analyses, the more likely you are to have a good sense of how the use will be viewed by different constituencies (what a consensus would be on each side of the dispute) and where arguments for or against a particular use are strongest and where they are weakest. All this is quite a delicate art. That's another thing that makes it difficult. But this is the test we've got. g Georgia Harper Scholarly Communications Advisor University of Texas at Austin Libraries 512.495.4653; 512.971.4325 (c) -----Original Message----- From: Jack Boeve [mailto:JBoeve@xxxxxxxx] Sent: Tuesday, July 31, 2007 7:12 AM To: digital-copyright@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: Permission to use screenshots of databases [On behalf of Kerry Ouellet (KOuellet@xxxxxxx)] A publisher recently gave me this checklist http://www.copyright.cornell.edu/policy/Fair_Use_Checklist.pdf to help me decide whether something falls under fair use. Unfortunately, the piece we were asking about did not. Good luck. ______________________ Kerry S. Ouellet Production Editor EDC's Center for Science Education 55 Chapel Street Newton, MA 02458-1060 P: 617-618-2570 F: 617-630-8439 Explore EDC's Center for Science Education at http://cse.edc.org/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Permission to use screenshots o, Jack Boeve | Thread | RE: Permission to use screenshots o, Jack Boeve |
Re: Permission to use screenshots o, Jack Boeve | Date | RE: Permission to use screenshots o, Jack Boeve |
Month |