Subject: Re: [stella] Re P2plus ? From: Rob <kudla@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 29 Sep 2000 07:57:48 -0400 |
At 12:17 AM 9/27/00 -0500, John Harvey wrote: >Upon first read, it looked like this was advertising a new "proto", being >advertised as a beta version. I find this poor wording. Be not misled. This How should those of us who enjoy hacking 2600 games identify that something is not ready for prime time yet, if not with "beta", "alpha", etc? Rob kudla@xxxxxxxxx ... http://kudla.org/raindog ... Rob -- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
[stella] Re P2plus ?, John Harvey | Thread | Re: [stella]P2plus and Hacked ROMS, John K. Harvey |
[stella] Re P2plus ?, John Harvey | Date | Re: [stella]P2plus and Hacked ROMS, John K. Harvey |
Month |