Subject: Aw: [stella] Pitfall! disassembly From: "Thomas Jentzsch" <tjentzsch@xxxxxx> Date: Thu, 11 Oct 2001 11:45:18 +0200 |
Manuel wrote: > Brilliant work! Thanks! (BTW: Sorry, that I forgot to zip the asm-file) > Compared to my own disassemblies I find that I'm way more lazy > to replace hardcoded values with equates (and doing all these > compile switches'n'stuff :-)). I'm a maniac in avoiding magic-numbers :) And compile switches are very useful for debugging too. > But some of the comments > match my own style, i.e. you're just saying what is done instead > of giving the exact to-the-bit analysis of how it's done... :-) There are only some comments, so it's a surprise, that you found enough of them to match your style :) For the to-the-bit analysis, the code should (mostly) speak for itself. > One question: Did you do the '2³' cycle timing style manually > or is that done by your diStella version? Yes, since I've allways done it that way, it's now in the changed Distella version I posted to the list in August. And that version should also be able, to recognize the extra cycle when a page-boundary is crossed (2³+1). Have fun! Thomas _______________________________________________________ Thomas Jentzsch | *** Every bit is sacred ! *** tjentzsch at web dot de | _______________________________________________________________________ 1.000.000 DM gewinnen - kostenlos tippen - http://millionenklick.web.de IhrName@xxxxxx, 8MB Speicher, Verschluesselung - http://freemail.web.de - Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Aw: [stella] Pitfall! disassembly, cybergoth | Thread | [stella] [Poll] Yet Another Disasse, cybergoth |
[stella] [Poll] Yet Another Disasse, cybergoth | Date | Re: [stella] Pitfall! disassembly, Piero Cavina |
Month |