Re: [stella] Star Voyager

Subject: Re: [stella] Star Voyager
From: "Glenn Saunders" <cybpunks@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 09:45:10 -0800

I think that's really the way it works.

From: Manuel Polik <cybergoth@xxxxxxxx>
Reply-To: stella@xxxxxxxxxxx
To: stella@xxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: [stella] Star Voyager
Date: Fri, 08 Feb 2002 15:43:42 +0100
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: from [] by (3.2) with ESMTP id MHotMailBE2D30EE00484136E84BD8DFD02907CB0; Fri, 08 Feb 2002 06:51:29 -0800
Received: (from majordom@localhost)by (8.8.8/8.8.5/BL-2) id JAA09867;Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:46:15 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ( [])by (8.8.8/8.8.5/BL-2) with ESMTP id JAA09855for <stella@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 09:46:09 -0500 (EST)
Received: from cybergoth ( [])by (Postfix) with SMTP id 16F343BCD1for <stella@xxxxxxxxxxx>; Fri, 8 Feb 2002 15:48:57 +0100 (CET)
From owner-stella@xxxxxxxxxxx Fri, 08 Feb 2002 06:53:07 -0800
Organization: XYPE
X-Mailer: Opera 5.12 build 932
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
Message-Id: <20020208144857.16F343BCD1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: owner-stella@xxxxxxxxxxx
Precedence: bulk

Hi there!

I just recognised, that the starfield in Star Voyager is
behaving very strange on both Z26 and Stella.

When moving to diagonals, the starfield gets a scrambled
mess after a little while. 3 stars just keep staying
where they are, the others keep moving either straight
vertical or sraight horizontal...

I wouldn't expect this from an Imagic title, so
is it really this crappy a routine - on the real thing
too - or is it from emulation only?


Archives (includes files) at
Unsub & more at

Join the world?s largest e-mail service with MSN Hotmail.

Archives (includes files) at
Unsub & more at

Current Thread