Subject: Re: [stella] ROM image classifications From: "John Saeger" <john@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2002 04:51:25 -0800 |
Glenn Saunders wrote: > Yeah, but hex is actually readable and hackable. That might actually be > useful if you wanted to fiddle with a ROM image whereas base64 is just > gobblygook. Of course, if people started doing that you'd need to > re-evaluate the MD5 hash, another reason NOT to embed the rom image in the > XML ;) So maybe there are two issues here. The database, and a new rom-image format. Maybe it's O.K. to start building the database and see how that goes. When it gets to the point of seeing how an emu might end up using that database, we can figure that out later. If it's human readable, then it can't be too hard for an emu. But we can use the database to make a new rom image format if we want. There's something I like about the idea of a homebrew author being in control of their own information, and packaging that information with the product. John ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] ROM image classificati, Glenn Saunders | Thread | Re: [stella] ROM image classificati, Matthias Hartl |
Re: [stella] FE, 3F, Bankswitching,, mickey_m | Date | RE: [stella] quick sprite replicati, Dennis Debro |
Month |