Subject: Re: [stella] Fu Kung! v0.04 From: "Fabrizio Zavagli" <rasty@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2003 19:57:06 +0100 |
Hi Andrew, > Actually there are two versions - I forgot to mention that the sprite system > is capable of single-line or double-line resolution... so here we see the > same frames but displayed in both sizes. It's currently a compile-time > change, not a runtime one (though runtime would be easy). I think I'll use > the large size... but am open to opinions on that. I like the single line more.. This way you will also have some more room to maybe do a background above the fighters...! Also, looks a lot more polished and less-2600 :) > Eckhard mentioned how to adjust my binary for Cuttle-Cart compatibility. > How many people would actually use a Cuttle-Cart compatible version to test > on hardware? I need to know if its worthwhile taking the time to make sure > the binary is Cuttle-Cart compatible. Again, I'm willing to test on a PAL jr and PAL 7800 with CuttleCart... Greets, Fabrizio.- ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] Fu Kung! v0.04, Glenn Saunders | Thread | Re: [stella] Fu Kung! v0.04, Chris Wilkson |
Re: [stella] Rubik Cube 3d, Christopher Tumber | Date | Re: [stella] Fu Kung! v0.04, Chris Wilkson |
Month |