Subject: Re: [stella] DASM 'upgrade' in progress From: "Thomas Jentzsch" <tjentzsch@xxxxxx> Date: Fri, 21 Mar 2003 08:56:42 +0100 |
Andrew wrote: > How about incorporating automatic playfield knowledge, too? Hm, sounds like a good idea to me. But it will be really complicated to make it useful. E.g you have to watch page boundaries, optimal fill the pages, maybe automatically find overlapping bytes, generate pointer tables etc. Also there will be quite a lot of parameters needed, which won't make handling especially for newbies very easy. IMO using a macro for highly specialized tasks *might* be a better idea. And something like PIC "X.XX.XX." (and many, many more useful things!) could be implemented as macro if we just extend the capabilities there a bit. Have?fun! Thomas _______________________________________________________ Thomas?Jentzsch?????????|?***?Every?bit?is?sacred?!?*** tjentzsch?at?web?dot?de?| ______________________________________________________________________________ Keine Lust, immer Ihre Adressdaten in eine E-Mail zu schreiben? Mit der vCard ist Schluss damit! Infos - http://freemail.web.de/features/?mc=021153 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] DASM 'upgrade' in prog, Thomas Jentzsch | Thread | Re: [stella] DASM 'upgrade' in prog, Andrew Davie |
Re: [stella] DASM 'upgrade' in prog, Thomas Jentzsch | Date | Re: [stella] DASM 'upgrade' in prog, Thomas Jentzsch |
Month |