Manuel wrote:
> How about replacing
>
> > lda #1 ;2
> > adc #0 ;2
>
> with 2 ROL? ;-)
That works, but unlike the first solution you don't know the
state of the carry flag after doing that.
> I think there might be another problem with your code
> though. From what the demo looks like, there's no
> granted carry state before the subtraction.
Hm, after doing
lda #1 ;2
adc #0 ;2
the carry is always clear. Where is the problem?
Have?fun!
Thomas
_______________________________________________________
Thomas?Jentzsch?????????|?***?Every?bit?is?sacred?!?***
tjentzsch?at?web?dot?de?|
____________________________________________________________________________
Jetzt bei WEB.DE FreeMail anmelden = 1qm Regenwald schuetzen! Helfen
Sie mit! Nutzen Sie den Serien-Testsieger. http://user.web.de/Regenwald
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
