Subject: Re: [stella] DASM question From: "Thomas Jentzsch" <tjentzsch@xxxxxx> Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:28:31 +0100 |
Thomas wrote:: > This mechanism works slightly different, though. The assembler doesn't look > for the nearest label called .P0. Instead, you define scopes for such local > labels with the subroutine directive: Yes, and IMO everything else is potentional dangerous. E.g. when you rearrange your code, the assembler might now choose a different label. Or when having two labels at the same distance. One version of the assembler might choose label 1 and another version label 2. Have?fun! Thomas _______________________________________________________ Thomas?Jentzsch?????????|?***?Every?bit?is?sacred?!?*** tjentzsch?at?web?dot?de?| _______________________________________________________________________ ... and the winner is... WEB.DE FreeMail! - Deutschlands beste E-Mail ist zum 39. Mal Testsieger (PC Praxis 03/04) http://f.web.de/?mc=021191 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] DASM question, Thomas Jentzsch | Thread | Re: [stella] DASM question, mathys66 |
Re: [stella] DASM question, mathys66 | Date | Re: [stella] DASM question, mathys66 |
Month |