Re: [stella] DASM question

Subject: Re: [stella] DASM question
From: "Thomas Jentzsch" <tjentzsch@xxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:28:31 +0100
Thomas wrote::
> This mechanism works slightly different, though. The assembler doesn't look
> for the nearest label called .P0. Instead, you define scopes for such local
> labels with the subroutine directive:

Yes, and IMO everything else is potentional dangerous. 

E.g. when you rearrange your code, the assembler might now choose a 
different label. Or when having two labels at the same distance. One 
version of the assembler might choose label 1 and another version label 2.


... and the winner is... WEB.DE FreeMail! - Deutschlands beste E-Mail
ist zum 39. Mal Testsieger (PC Praxis 03/04)

Archives (includes files) at
Unsub & more at

Current Thread