Subject: Re: [stella] DASM question From: mathys66@xxxxxxxxxx Date: Fri, 26 Mar 2004 09:44:54 +0100 |
>Yes, and IMO everything else is potentional dangerous. sure. >E.g. when you rearrange your code, the assembler might now choose a >different label. Or when having two labels at the same distance. One >version of the assembler might choose label 1 and another version label 2. i'm getting offtopic here, but gas uses the mechanism with the nearest labels, but when you branch you have to specify wether the assembler has to look for that nearest label forwards or backwards (that is, down or up in the source). this fixes the same distance problem. dasm's mechanism is still better =) cheers thomas ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] DASM question, Thomas Jentzsch | Thread | Re: [stella] DASM question, Erik Mooney |
Re: [stella] DASM question, Thomas Jentzsch | Date | Re: [stella] behold, i am become sh, Manuel Rotschkar |
Month |