|
Subject: [stella] Indirect indexed addressing From: "Erik Mooney" <erik@xxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 17:27:10 -0500 |
Forgive me if this sounds stupid from a veteran of 2600 programming, but bear with me... Is it true that indexed-indirect addressing as LDA ($nn),Y is limited to zero-page addressing? Seems that way, with DASM throwing an error if $nn > $FF. Of course, this isn't usually an issue for 2600 programming - I only bumped into it when coding for Superchip RAM - but it seems like a pretty severe limitation for the 6502 in other environments? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| [stella] Reflex: Status update, Lee Fastenau | Thread | Re: [stella] Indirect indexed addre, Manuel Rotschkar |
| RE: [stella] Rally X Update, Lee Fastenau | Date | Re: [stella] Indirect indexed addre, Manuel Rotschkar |
| Month |