Re: [stella] Indirect indexed addressing

Subject: Re: [stella] Indirect indexed addressing
From: Erik Mooney <erik@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 26 Apr 2004 20:10:50 -0400
>> Is it true that indexed-indirect addressing as LDA ($nn),Y is limited
>> to zero-page addressing?  Seems that way, with DASM throwing an error
>> if $nn > $FF.
>Sad but true, yes.

Thanks for the confirmation.  At least now I finally understand how
SkipDraw works.  I always thought LDA ($nn),Y was a 3-byte instruction -
an opcode plus a 2-byte (16-bit) operand - and could never figure out how
the BIT opcode skipped 3 bytes in the instruction stream. :)

Archives (includes files) at
Unsub & more at

Current Thread