Subject: Re: [stella] 2600 emulators vs. MAME From: "jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <jeremy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 17 May 2004 17:04:56 -0400 |
> Yeah...disregard my previous post. I dug around and found the jpegs. > > I'm not sure which one I like better. The filtered version looks...well... > filtered. Blurry. I might like it better if it was a moving image though. > It's too bad there's not an easy, universal way to make the edges both > smooth AND crisp. Actually, there is! http://scale2x.sf.net/ Personally, I'd say this particular filter would be the best bet for attempting to enhance 2600 graphics, since it tries to find curves. I'm kind of surprised that no one brought it up sooner. Jeremy -------------------------------------------------------------------- mail2web - Check your email from the web at http://mail2web.com/ . ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] 2600 emulators vs. MAM, Glenn Saunders | Thread | Re: [stella] 2600 emulators vs. MAM, Andrew Davie |
Re: [stella] 2600 emulators vs. MAM, Stephen Anthony | Date | Re: [stella] The Dig?, Glenn Saunders |
Month |