Subject: Re: [stella] progress with PlayerPal 2600 From: Kirk Israel <kirkjerk@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:15:10 -0400 |
Hmmm, so would 3:2 or 4:2 be a better bet? I've heard two people suggest 1.667:1 and one say 2 to 1 is indeed the best...does z26 get it more or less right? On 5/16/05, Eric Ball <ericball@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > From: "Kirk Israel" > > Question...does anyone know the approximate ratio of the width and > > height of player graphic pixels? The edtior uses square pixels, but it > > looks like a 2:1 ratio might be a closer match, does that sound right? > > square pixel (640x480) NTSC has 780 pixels per line therefore 2600 NTSC > pixel is 12:7 and 2600 PAL pixel is 72:35 (very close to 2:1) > > Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ > Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com > > Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] progress with PlayerPa, Eric Ball | Thread | Re: [stella] progress with PlayerPa, Adam Thornton |
[stella] Re: HMOVE lines, Eric Ball | Date | Re: [stella] progress with PlayerPa, Adam Thornton |
Month |