Re: [stella] progress with PlayerPal 2600

Subject: Re: [stella] progress with PlayerPal 2600
From: Kirk Israel <kirkjerk@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 16 May 2005 23:15:10 -0400
Hmmm, so would 3:2 or 4:2 be a better bet? I've heard two people
suggest 1.667:1 and one say 2 to 1 is indeed the best...does z26 get
it more or less right?

On 5/16/05, Eric Ball <ericball@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> From: "Kirk Israel"
> > Question...does anyone know the approximate ratio of the width and
> > height of player graphic pixels? The edtior uses square pixels, but it
> > looks like a 2:1 ratio might be a closer match, does that sound right?
> 
> square pixel (640x480) NTSC has 780 pixels per line therefore 2600 NTSC
> pixel is 12:7 and 2600 PAL pixel is 72:35 (very close to 2:1)
> 
> Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
> Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com
> 
>
Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/
Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com

Current Thread