Subject: Re: [stella] compact send-only serial subroutine From: Glenn Saunders <mos6507@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2005 14:30:12 -0400 |
I'll stick to send-only for now. The receive really happens on the Supercharger so there isn't a need for it outside of handshaking signals. John K. Harvey's Teleterm sounds like he didn't introduce any extra parts in his cable. http://tinyurl.com/7ozbm In the meantime, do you want to finish wiring up a cable for send and receive and try out his binary? I don't think he's using CTS/RTS but there would be definite advantages there if you are talking about a real terminal program. --- Fred Quimby <c9r@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I forgot that you should have a diode too so that > the -12v doesn't make it > through. This circuit should output about +3v for > +12v and 0v for -12v. > Should produce valid TTL levels for serial ports > that output +9v and up. If > your serial port outputs less than 9v, reduce the > size of the 3k resistor > accordingly. > > 3k > 2600 Pin 2 ----/\/\/\/\------|<---- TxD (pin 3 on > PC) > | > \ > / > \ 1k > / > | > GND > > > Archives (includes files) at > http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ > Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com > > __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around http://mail.yahoo.com Archives (includes files) at http://www.biglist.com/lists/stella/archives/ Unsub & more at http://stella.biglist.com
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [stella] compact send-only seri, Fred Quimby | Thread | Re: [stella] compact send-only seri, Chris Wilkson |
Re: [stella] Announcing "webTune260, B. Watson | Date | Re: [stella] Announcing "webTune260, Rob |
Month |