Subject: RE: MSXML abominations happening for a reason (was Re: MSXML...re leased) From: Linda van den Brink <lvdbrink@xxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 17 Mar 2000 14:41:16 +0100 |
> This could very well be true, but it is still problematic, and for me > it is hard to understand why Microsoft chooses to implement XSLT at > all if they don't believe in it. It is equally hard to understand why > they choose to only implement it half-heartedly when they first decide > to implement it. I don't think they're implementing it half-heartedly, they're just pre-releasing their parser/processor every two months or so with a few more XSLT/XPath features implemented. Eventually they say they will implement XSLT and XPath entirely. And so far it seems as though they're sticking to that plan. Discussion on which feature they should implement next is definitely possible. Actually microsoft people were asking for input from the community about priorities a while ago on their xsl newsgroups. Maybe they should have come to this list... Linda XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: MSXML abominations happening fo, Arjun Ray | Thread | FOP out of sequence specifiers, Volkmann, Mark |
Re: Microsoft XSL and Conformance, David Carlisle | Date | Re: Determining the set of attribut, nigel . byrnes |
Month |