Subject: Re: position() From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2000 09:06:48 GMT |
> I just noticed that in XT, position() behaves in this way: as it should. > then the xpath expression "A/C[position()=2]" selects the 3rd child > of A, not the second one. [ ...] applies to the current step so just C here. If you want to select C children that are the second child of A then "A/*[position()=2 and self::C] > (I mean, it requires an xsl:if test="name(*[position()=2])='C']" ) name() isn't so safe, as it will be wrong if unexpected namespace prefixes are used. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
position(), Emmanuel Pietriga | Thread | RE: position(), Kay Michael |
Re: using default params?, David Carlisle | Date | XSL/XSLT components on Wintel, MarkH |
Month |