|
Subject: Re: Implementing " and ' in literals From: David Carlisle <davidc@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 11:57:37 +0100 (BST) |
> You seem to be missing the point completely. See my reply to David > Carlisle. No, the point is that you can't change a specification from one implementation. That's the entire HTML mess that XML was designed to avoid: implementors adding features whenever they wanted leading to a competitive race and total document inoperablility. The specification may not be perfect, but the solution is to update the specification, not to make a non conforming implementation. David XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: Implementing " and ' in literal, Matt Sergeant | Thread | RE: Implementing " and ' in literal, Julian Reschke |
| Re: Implementing " and ' in literal, David Carlisle | Date | RE: Implementing " and ' in literal, Julian Reschke |
| Month |