Subject: RE: Implementing " and ' in literals From: "Julian Reschke" <reschke@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 20 Apr 2000 13:19:09 +0200 |
> > You seem to be missing the point completely. See my reply to David > > Carlisle. > > No, the point is that you can't change a specification from one > implementation. That's the entire HTML mess that XML was designed to > avoid: implementors adding features whenever they wanted leading > to a competitive race and total document inoperablility. > > The specification may not be perfect, but the solution is to update the > specification, not to make a non conforming implementation. Well, XPath knows about variable bindings, and using a variable it would be possible to put "any" string into an XPath expression. The question is just how to extend the language-dependant APIs to XPath so that you can actually bind something to a variable name. XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Implementing " and ' in literal, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: Implementing " and ' in literal, Matt Sergeant |
RE: Javascript within XSLT, Igor Nakshin | Date | Re: Implementing " and ' in literal, David Carlisle |
Month |