Re: Sibling text() Content Match [was: Re: expression value not a node set on content match]

Subject: Re: Sibling text() Content Match [was: Re: expression value not a node set on content match]
From: John Robert Gardner <jrgardn@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 May 2000 18:42:56 -0400 (EDT)
Thanks mike-- yes, you're right, I left off text() in the pasted code,
even when I put it in the subject line

If I'm right, using text() would have alleviated some of the
redundancy/lack of specificity that David pointed out in my solution, yes?

=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=
John Robert Gardner, Ph.D.
XML Engineer
Emory University
------------------------------------------------------------
http://vedavid.org/diss/
"If there is something you're thinking of doing, or wish you could do,
begin it.  In boldness there is mystery and power . . . . "  -Goethe



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list


Current Thread