Re: XLST Processors Performace

Subject: Re: XLST Processors Performace
From: Petr Cimprich <petr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 09 May 2000 11:24:05 +0200

Sablotron should be taken as an alpha release.
The main features missing in sablotron 0.33 include:


The complete comparation of current version to the W3C specs is on

If you need some of these features now, you have to use another
processor. Missing features of course help sablotron to be a little bit
faster but even when completed, a compiled C program still should be
faster than Java etc.


Steve Willer wrote:

> On Tue, 9 May 2000, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
> > obviously, the other XSLT processors (MS, Oracle C version, the
> > gingerall one), however laudable in some ways, simply lack all the
> > necessary language features.
> This is surprising to me, and is of particular interest because I was
> planning to use gingerall's Sablotron due to its speed and apparent
> completeness. Could you elaborate on what you think is missing and
> essential?
>  XSL-List info and archive:

Petr Cimprich
Ginger Alliance Ltd.

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread