Re: XLST Processors Performace

[Petr Cimprich <petr@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Steve,

Sablotron should be taken as an alpha release.
The main features missing in sablotron 0.33 include:

xsl:key,
xsl:number,
xsl:fallback,
xsl:import,
xsl:sort.

The complete comparation of current version to the W3C specs is on
http://www.gingerall.com/charlie-bin/get/webGA/act/sablot_man.act

If you need some of these features now, you have to use another
processor. Missing features of course help sablotron to be a little bit
faster but even when completed, a compiled C program still should be
faster than Java etc.

Petr

Steve Willer wrote:

> On Tue, 9 May 2000, Sebastian Rahtz wrote:
>
> > obviously, the other XSLT processors (MS, Oracle C version, the
> > gingerall one), however laudable in some ways, simply lack all the
> > necessary language features.
>
> This is surprising to me, and is of particular interest because I was
> planning to use gingerall's Sablotron due to its speed and apparent
> completeness. Could you elaborate on what you think is missing and
> essential?
>
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

--
Petr Cimprich
Ginger Alliance Ltd.
www.gingerall.com



 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list