RE: Matching Attributes with @

[John Robert Gardner <jrgardn@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Fri, 26 May 2000, Kay Michael wrote:

> Confusion upon confusion!

> Actually, you've come to exactly the opposite of the truth. An element is
> the parent of its attributes, but the attributes are not children of the
> element.
> 
> And if that seems absurd, just substitute some non-biological words like
> "controller" and "component" for "parent" and "child", and it doesn't seem
> so bad.

I must be getting punchy.  Would I be pardoned for punning that, in
effect, all attributes are bastards, then?

Offered as a laugh and as thanks to everyone who's helped so much.

:-()

jr

> 
> Mike K
> 
> 
>  XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
> 


 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list