Subject: Re: Apache Module (Xalan?) From: "Jon Smirl" <jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 1 Jun 2000 22:08:06 -0400 |
To: <xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > MSXML3 sure is much faster than that!!! Have you benchmarked MSXML3 versus the C version of Xalan? My times are for a complete round trip though an HTTP server including the page transform. XSL is just part of the equation, there's a SQL server involved too. I'm also still undecided about the impact of having three processes (Apache, app server (JServ/XT/XP), dbengine) vs a single process scheme. Has anyone done any pure benchmarks of just a cached XSLT transform on MSXML3 vs Xalan? Jon Smirl jonsmirl@xxxxxxxxxxxx XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: Apache Module (Xalan?), paulo . gaspar | Thread | RE: Apache Module (Xalan?) - XSLT p, Paulo Gaspar |
Re: ANN: Maintenance 4xt, David Carlisle | Date | XSL-List guidelines -changed, XSL-List Owner |
Month |