Subject: RE: [OT] Re: Apache Module (Xalan?) From: "Paulo Gaspar" <Paulo.Gaspar@xxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Jun 2000 16:20:47 +0200 |
Let's say it is getting much better... in beta. Check: http://msdn.microsoft.com/xml and http://msdn.microsoft.com/workshop/xml/general/msxmlprev.asp Have fun, Paulo -----Original Message----- From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of Sebastian Rahtz Sent: Thursday, June 01, 2000 10:04 PM To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Subject: Re: [OT] Re: Apache Module (Xalan?) Jon Smirl writes: > solution. Now that MS is up to speed on the XSL bandwagon I'm looking at ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ > moving all of my transforms into the browser. really? did I miss an announcment? do they have an XSL processor that implements the missing bits of the spec? Sebastian XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [OT] Re: Apache Module (Xalan?), Sebastian Rahtz | Thread | RE: Apache Module (Xalan?), paulo . gaspar |
Keys across multilple input files, Ann Marie Rubin - Su | Date | RE: XSL Performance, Paulo Gaspar |
Month |