Subject: Re: Best way to handle multiple string replacements? From: Warren Hedley <w.hedley@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2000 10:42:20 -0400 |
Sebastian Rahtz wrote: > > I am full of admiration for Jeni's ingenuity, but I wonder whether a > simpler approach might not be to build a lookup table of character > positions and their expansions (using XSL keys), and then cycle over > the text letter by letter seeing if there is a replacement? With longish text nodes, this approach could result in some pretty deep recursion couldn't it? I once managed to crash Saxon using exactly this approach (although I can't duplicate that result now). > If you work by cycling through the replacements, surely > > <foo:char>$</foo:char> > and > <foo:replace>$\mathbb{P}$</foo:replace> > > will fight? the $ in the second fragment might end up escaped This always happens with languages with special characters (even XML, when doing some dodgy escaping to produce elements). So far I've always managed to find an order of character replacement that works. If not, you can replace special characters with some really unlikely string, do some more replacement, and then replace the unlikely string with the desired result as the final step. -- Warren Hedley Department of Engineering Science Auckland University New Zealand XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Best way to handle multiple str, Warren Hedley | Thread | Re: Best way to handle multiple str, Sebastian Rahtz |
Is Xalan C++ really that slow?, Mack, Daniel | Date | Re: Standalone Attributes?, Warren Hedley |
Month |