Subject: RE: Best way to handle multiple string replacements? From: Kay Michael <Michael.Kay@xxxxxxx> Date: Tue, 6 Jun 2000 18:46:56 +0100 |
> With longish text nodes, this approach could result in some pretty > deep recursion couldn't it? I once managed to crash Saxon using > exactly this approach (although I can't duplicate that result now). Since 5.3 Saxon uses tail recursion where it can - I think it will do so in the recursive templates published by Jeni. If tail recursion is invoked, of course, the depth of recursion doesn't lead to an increase in memory requirement. Mike K XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Best way to handle multiple str, Warren Hedley | Thread | saxon params, Carole E. Mah |
Re: xt and xalan also? (was RE: sax, Mike Brown | Date | Re: namespace declarations, Mike Brown |
Month |