Subject: Re: Saxon Frustrations From: AndrewWatt2000@xxxxxxx Date: Wed, 21 Jun 2000 13:14:02 EDT |
In a message dated 21/06/00 18:05:10 GMT Daylight Time, Paul_Dick@xxxxxxxxx writes: > Were you using Instant Saxon, or the full blown Saxon? I've had similar > troubles with the Instant Saxon. I emailed Mike about it but have not > heard from him. The older version of Instant Saxon 5.2 did work. Paul, Thanks for the response. It is a comfort to know that others have had similar problems. It seemed *so* basic I just couldn't figure out why it wasn't working. You got it ... I was using Instant Saxon. Can the older version of Instant Saxon still be downloaded, do you happen to know? One of the things I noticed when examining the version of InstantSaxon 5.3.2 is that it refers to Java 1.1.4, which seems pretty elderly now. That may be wholly a red herring but I thought I would mention it. As I understand it the full version of Saxon ought to work on Windows too so I will download that and give it a go. Andrew Watt XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: Saxon Frustrations, Paul_Dick | Thread | Re: Saxon Frustrations, Paul_Dick |
passing a parameter to select attri, Ryan Daigle | Date | Re: Including javascript files in H, JB Blond |
Month |