Re: XSL/T Engine Comparisons

<-prev [Thread] next->	<-prev [Date] next->
Month Index \| List Home

Re: XSL/T Engine Comparisons

Subject: Re: XSL/T Engine Comparisons
From: Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:12:59 +0100 (BST)

Steve Carton writes:
 > I would like to know if anyone out here has done some sort of 
 > comparative analysis of the various XSL/T engines, both from  
 > speed and from "adherence" viewpoints.

None of them meet the spec fully, except Saxon, so far as I can see.
I can blow up Xalan and Oracle fairly easily; xt, sablotron and
Microsft all have clearly defined missing features.

Sebastian Rahtz

 XSL-List info and archive:  http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list

Current Thread
RE: a special char question, (continued) Ryan Daigle - Fri, 23 Jun 2000 09:49:04 -0400 Selim Cesic - Fri, 23 Jun 2000 15:56:14 +0200 Selim Cesic - Tue, 27 Jun 2000 11:27:59 +0200 Steve Carton - Fri, 23 Jun 2000 10:21:55 -0400 Sebastian Rahtz - Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:12:59 +0100 (BST) <= Steve Muench - Fri, 23 Jun 2000 16:36:49 -0700 Paul Tchistopolskii - Fri, 23 Jun 2000 17:59:00 -0700 Sebastian Rahtz - Sat, 24 Jun 2000 23:36:42 +0100 (BST) Paul Tchistopolskii - Sat, 24 Jun 2000 16:10:07 -0700

Current Thread

RE: a special char question, (continued)

<- Previous	Index	Next ->
XSL/T Engine Comparisons, Steve Carton	Thread	Re: XSL/T Engine Comparisons, Steve Muench
Re: XML to WML, Daniel Hinz	Date	RE: Outputting "entire nodes" 2, Kay Michael
	Month