Subject: Re: [xsl] Specifying element associated with attribute From: Miloslav Nic <nicmila@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 11:31:55 +0100 |
Kay Michael wrote: > > > attributes are not, contrary to what one might think, the children of > > their elements. But elements are their attributes' parents. > > An interesting paradox, that only makes sense if you consider that > > attributes are like rebellious teenagers. > > But anthropormorphic analogies still have their limitations - rebellious > teenagers generally have two parents, while attributes only have one. > But on the other hand you can be sure who is the parent ;) -- ****************************************** <firstName> Miloslav </firstName> <surname> Nic </surname> <mail> nicmila@xxxxxxxxx </mail> <support> http://www.zvon.org </support> <zvonMailingList> http://www.zvon.org/index.php?nav_id=4 </zvonMailingList> XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Specifying element associ, Kay Michael | Thread | [xsl] Theoretical question, Handren Mokri |
RE: [xsl] Namespace question, Kay Michael | Date | RE: [xsl] Name of current node's pa, Kay Michael |
Month |