|
Subject: Re: [xsl] Unique Text From: Mike Moran <Mike.Moran@xxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 17:07:22 +0000 |
David Carlisle wrote:
>
> > but can I do words too?
>
> yes, but to be honest you probably don't want to (it'd take some rather
> hairy rrecursive templates, probably) Can't you just pass perl over the
> input forst and make every word be marked up as
> <word>this</word> <word>is</word> <word>a</word> <word>word</word>
> which would make your life so much easier.
>
> It was mentioned on this list the other day that saxon has an extension
> function to tokenise white space separated strings as a node list,
> which would be an equivalent suggestion
That's probably not worth it. I was mostly just wanting to reduce parse
time of the perl script by turning everything into plain text. Reducing
links to a set makes sense since it doesn't require a lot of work and it
will minimise crawling on the perl script side.
Btw, is there any way to get the base URI of a document *whilst* parsing
it?
--
Mike.Moran@xxxxxxxxxxx
Web: http://houseofmoran.com/
AvantGo: http://houseofmoran.com/Lite/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| Re: [xsl] Unique Text, David Carlisle | Thread | Re: [xsl] Unique Text, David Carlisle |
| RE: [xsl] xsl:for-each?, Kevin Duffey | Date | Re: [xsl] Unique Text, David Carlisle |
| Month |