Subject: RE: [xsl] xsl:for-each? From: "Kevin Duffey" <kevin.duffey@xxxxxxxx> Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2001 08:58:07 -0800 |
Heh..Yeah..I realized that AFTER I sent the email. Stupid me. > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > [mailto:owner-xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]On Behalf Of David > Carlisle > Sent: Monday, January 22, 2001 1:21 AM > To: xsl-list@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Cc: goetze@xxxxxxxxxxxx > Subject: Re: [xsl] xsl:for-each? > > > > > Or..is it because the xsl node is > > already selected to "markets" that it is looking inside the first market > > node it comes across and isn't finding anything called markets? > > You answered your own question. > > David > > _____________________________________________________________________ > This message has been checked for all known viruses by Star > Internet delivered > through the MessageLabs Virus Control Centre. For further > information visit > http://www.star.net.uk/stats.asp > > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list > XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
Re: [xsl] xsl:for-each?, David Carlisle | Thread | [xsl] tables in xsl:fo, Ulf Carlsson |
Re: [xsl] Unique Text, David Carlisle | Date | Re: [xsl] Unique Text, Mike Moran |
Month |