Subject: RE: [xsl] New nntp news group for xsl-fo discussion From: DPawson@xxxxxxxxxxx Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2001 14:40:53 -0000 |
Ken Holman > XSL-FO@xxxxxxxxxxx exists and is already getting active ... I > feel that > should suffice if it isn't acceptable to put everything on > this Mulberry list. I have heard comments that fo's aren't in vogue on this list, which is putting people off who want fo rather than XSLT discussion. If volume is increasing, perhaps Mulberrytech might think again about running a seperate list for XSLT-FO? Regards DaveP XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] New nntp news group for x, Max Dunn | Thread | RE: [xsl] New nntp news group for x, Max Dunn |
[xsl] Handling Directory Trees, David_Benua | Date | RE: [xsl] new xslt book, Shimon Pozin |
Month |