RE: [xsl] Quasi-Literals and XML

Subject: RE: [xsl] Quasi-Literals and XML
From: "Michael Kay" <mhkay@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 31 Jan 2001 16:35:16 -0000
> My point is that in the first place the statement that XSL is not
> Turing-complete is debatable

It's not debatable, it's a lie, thanks for drawing it to our attention.

But presumably xmlhack isn't a peer-reviewed journal, so anyone with a
product to peddle can say what they like.

Mike Kay

 XSL-List info and archive:

Current Thread