|
Subject: RE: [xsl] Can sets have order? From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 03:00:00 -0800 (PST) |
I find this an illustrative example of how one should not start and
continue an argument.
I believe this is sufficient for everyone to draw conclusions...
Dimitre.
Originally Wolfgang May wrote:
> ... Such nodes may be exchanged in the node set without
> changing the behavior of any XPath query.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Now Wolfgang May writes:
> These all are *relative* expressions - so these queries use the
> _premise_ the nodes can be distinguished to show that they can be
> distinguished.
>
> For all (absolute) queries on the document
>
> //path/one-of-the-above-expressions
>
> there is no difference if the nodes are exchanged.
__________________________________________________
Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35
a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
| Current Thread |
|---|
|
| <- Previous | Index | Next -> |
|---|---|---|
| RE: [xsl] Can sets have order?, Wolfgang May | Thread | RE: [xsl] Can sets have order?, Wolfgang May |
| Re: [xsl] Selecting all the childre, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Can sets have order?, Wolfgang May |
| Month |