Subject: RE: [xsl] Can sets have order? From: Dimitre Novatchev <dnovatchev@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Fri, 2 Feb 2001 03:00:00 -0800 (PST) |
I find this an illustrative example of how one should not start and continue an argument. I believe this is sufficient for everyone to draw conclusions... Dimitre. Originally Wolfgang May wrote: > ... Such nodes may be exchanged in the node set without > changing the behavior of any XPath query. ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ Now Wolfgang May writes: > These all are *relative* expressions - so these queries use the > _premise_ the nodes can be distinguished to show that they can be > distinguished. > > For all (absolute) queries on the document > > //path/one-of-the-above-expressions > > there is no difference if the nodes are exchanged. __________________________________________________ Get personalized email addresses from Yahoo! Mail - only $35 a year! http://personal.mail.yahoo.com/ XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
Current Thread |
---|
|
<- Previous | Index | Next -> |
---|---|---|
RE: [xsl] Can sets have order?, Wolfgang May | Thread | RE: [xsl] Can sets have order?, Wolfgang May |
Re: [xsl] Selecting all the childre, David Carlisle | Date | RE: [xsl] Can sets have order?, Wolfgang May |
Month |